The information presented has been compiled from:
ASHRAE Fundamentals - 2001
Moisture Control in Buildings
CMHC
NRC/IRC
IEA Annex 24
Manufacturer data
When using this information, it MUST be done in the following context:
Some of these properties are difficult to measure and very sensitive to small changes in the material. That is why ranges are often given and any single value should be considered "representative."
The importance of the numbers is almost always in the context of the numbers for substitute or alternative materials.
In order to compare numbers, they must be in the same units and obtained under the same standard test conditions - a very tall order. This is the main reason that a table like this has never really been compiled before. The table and its contents will continue to be refined and gaps filled in.
The importance of the numbers is almost always in the context of a given building assembly, for a given climate.
There are very few if any bad building materials, from a building science perspective; bad applications, however, abound.
The most important column in this table is likely to be the "Comments" column because it includes the experience/expertise/unique perspective of many of the leading building scientists in North America. The title of this column could be "OK - now what do these numbers REALLY mean?"
Use this table to augment the information provided in the Designs That Work and Enclosures That Work resources. And remember, this resource attempts to supply you with the best knowledge currently available - your professional and field use of it turns it into wisdom.
This table is a work in progress - please direct questions or comments to: info@buildingscience.com.
HPR= Hydrostatic Pressure Resistance (AATCC127) | SD = Smoke Development (ASTM E84) | |
AP = Air permeability (ASTM E2178-01) | WA = Water Adsorption (ASTM C209) | |
FS = Flame Spread (ASTM E84) |
| |
| MGI/IC - Mold Growth Index for Interior Coatings |
|
Material | Typical Relevant Dimension | Water Vapor Permeability | Water Absorption2 | R-Value | Other Relevant Properties | Comments | Web Link for More Information | ||
Dry Cup | Wet Cup | ||||||||
Exterior Sheathings | |||||||||
Plywood (CDX) | 3/8" | 0.75 | 3.5 | na | 0.5 | FS =76-200 | At saturation, | ||
OSB | 3/8" | 0.75 | 2 | na | 0.5 | FS = 148 | At saturation, | ||
Fiberboard - asphalt impregnated | 7/16" | 14.5 | 15 | 2.3 - 7% | 1.2 | FS > 75 | Among the most | ||
Thin profile structural sheathing | .078" - .137" | 0.5 - 0.6 | 0.5 - 0.6 | na | 0.2 - 3.4 |
| R-value | ||
Foil-faced PIR insulation | 1" | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0% | 7 | FS = 5 | Combined | ||
XPS rigid insulation | 1" | 1 | 1 | 0.10% | 5 | FS = 5 | Compare/contrast | ||
XPS (skinned) | 3/8" | 0? | 0? |
| 1.5 |
| Polypro skin |
| |
EPS rigid insulation (Type II - 1.5 pcf density) | 1" | 3.5 |
| 3% | 3.7 | FS = 20 | There are lots of | ||
Glass mat faced gypsum board (DensGlass®) | 1/2" | 23 |
| 5% | 0.56 | FS = 0 | Among the most | ||
Wall Claddings | |||||||||
Brick | 31/2" |
| 1.7 - 13.7 |
| 0.1 |
| Properties as | ||
Traditional stucco | 7/8" | 3.8 | 5.8 |
| 0.1 |
| Properties as |
| |
Polymer-modified stucco |
|
|
|
|
|
| Vapor |
| |
Wood lap siding (unfinished) | 3/8" | "35 perms" |
| 0.5 | FS = 69 | 35 perms is an |
| ||
Fibercement lap siding (primed all surfaces) | 5/16" | 1.5 |
|
|
| FS = 0 | Siding comes in | ||
Vinyl lap siding | n/a | "70 perms" |
|
|
| 70 perms is an | |||
Interior Wallboards | |||||||||
Standard paper-faced | 1/2" | 40 |
|
|
| FS = 15 | Both faces and |
|
|
DensArmor Plus™ | 1/2" | 12 | 23 | 5% |
| FS = 10 | Paper facings are |
| |
Fiberock® | 1/2" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardie Tilebacker | 13/32" | 2.8 |
|
|
| FS = 0 |
|
| |
DensShield® | 1/2" |
|
|
|
|
| A tilebacker |
| |
Durock® | 1/2" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-paper faced gypsum board: Fiberock Aqua-TOUGH™ | 1/2" |
| 35 |
| .5 | FS = 5 | Drainage pattern |
| |
Cavity Fill Insulations | |||||||||
Fiberglass/Rockwool (unfaced batt) | 31/2" | 120 | 168 |
| 11 | FS = 10 | The thermal | ||
Cellulose | 31/2" |
| 75 | 13 | FS SD | While the air | |||
Icynene - modified spray urethane | 31/2" | 16 |
| 0% | 12.6-14 | FS SD AP = 0.008 | While all spray | ||
Flooring | |||||||||
Hardwood | 3/4" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Softwood | 3/4" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Glazed tile | 3/8" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Synthetic carpet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Organic fiber carpet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Linoleum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Vinyl tile |
|
|
|
|
|
| essentially vapor |
| |
Vinyl sheet | 1/32" - 1/16" |
|
|
|
|
| essentially vapor |
| |
|
| Vapor
| Permeance (Perms)1 Wet Cup | Air Permeance |
|
|
|
| |
Sheet Good Building Products | |||||||||
No. 15 asphalt-saturated felt |
| 6 | 31 | 0.4 |
|
| vapor permeable |
| |
No. 30 asphalt-saturated felt |
|
|
| 0.19 |
|
| should be |
| |
Tyvek® |
|
| 58 | 0.0045 (@ wind pressure 30 mph) |
| HPR=210 cm |
| ||
Typar® | 0.013" | 14 |
| 0.0023 |
| HPR=165 cm |
|
| |
60-minute roofing paper: Fortifiber Two-Ply Super Jumbo Tex | two ply | 11
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Polyethylene | .004-.006 (4-6 mils) | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0? |
| FS = 5-35 | a vapor barrier |
| |
MemBrain™ | 2-mil | 1 | 12+ |
|
| FS = 75 | well-suited as a | ||
Coatings | |||||||||
Vapor retarder primer | 0.25 mm | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Latex paint |
| 3.5-6.1 | ~17 |
|
|
| although | ||
Exterior acrylic paint |
| 5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Semi-gloss vinyl acrylic enamel |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Exterior oil-based paint (3 coats) |
| 0.3-1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oil paint |
| 1.6 - 3 |
|
|
|
| various primers |
| |
Elastomeric paint |
|
|
|
|
|
| substantial |
|
- The water vapor permeability of a material is roughly inversely proportional to its thickness—doubling the thickness halves the permeance. It's more complicated for films and coating, however, and this rule should not be applied to these materials.
- Although manufacturers often report this property per ASTM C209 and as a percent by weight, this only gives information about the material's POROSITY (overall quantity of water absorbed over an indefinite—long, often 24 hours—time period) and what is much more useful is the material's water absorption coefficient, a measure of WICKING (initial rate of capillary transport). There is unfortunately NO relationship between the two, no ASTM standard for the water absorption coefficient, and few manufacturers in North America have measured or reported water absorption coefficients. When researching a building product, strongly encourage manufacturers to PROVIDE the water absorption coefficient.